Pages

Friday, March 22, 2024

An Interesting Petro-Hunt Pad With An Old Well To Be Re-Entered; New Well To Be Fracked? March 22, 2024

Locator: 46831B.

This might be an interesting pad to follow.

This blog was done quickly while being distracted; there may be typographical and content errors.

A three-well Petro-Hunt pad in Little Knife oil field..

Curious:

  • one new well has only been on line since August, 2021; a great well; abruptly off line as of 11/23;
  • an old well, drilled back in 2012, taken off line in 2023, and is now back on confidential status; with HR -- horizontal re-entry;
  • third well is a new permit / location and on confidential list; no available information;

The wells:

  • 36079, loc/IA, Petro-Hunt, Hartman 144-97-5B-8-2H, Little Knife, t8/21; cum 185K 10/23; off line abruptly, 11/23;
  • 20860, conf, Petro-Hunt, Hartman 144-97-5A-81HR, Little Knife, t7/12; last production, 10/23; lousy well; producing at only 1,000 bbls/month; to come off confidential list, 4/10/24;
  • 38737, conf, Petro-Hunt, Hartman 144-97-5A-8-3H, Little Knife, to come off confidential list, 5/12/24;

With only this data, my hunch:

  • drilling on this pad in progress or about to proceed;
  • #20860: to be re-entered and re-fracked:
  • #36079: taken off line while #20860 to be re-entered/re-fracked;
  • 38737: on confidential; likely soon to be drilled

We'll see if any reader out there might have another idea.

The pad:

Week 12: March 18, 2024 -- March 24, 2024

Locator: 46830TOPSTORY.

Top story:

  • US DOJ sues Apple for monopoly; shares plunge same day;
  • Trump unable to post bond; now says he has $500 million in cash

Top international non-energy story:

  • Red Sea remains closed; attacks on US Navy surge; seems unable to effectively counter -- unchanged

Top international energy story:

  • ISIS kills 45 at Moscow concert

Top national non-energy story:


Top national energy story:

  • WTI trends toward $82 before falling back to 80

Focus on fracking: link here.

Top North Dakota non-energy story:


Top North Dakota energy story:


Geoff Simon's quick connects: link here.

Apple -- AAPL -- Thoughts -- Complete -- Minor Tweaking Going Forward -- March 22, 2024

Locator: 46829AAPL.

Tag: AAPL Apple extended family member advisor

Updates

July 15, 2024: AAPL has surged over the past few weeks, not trading at new 52-week highs, trading at $235.

March 24, 2024: why Apple will prevail.

Original Post 

This is for an extended family member who has asked me about AAPL.

I had planned to send the family member a personal e-mail but then thought it would be easier to "do it" this way and then update it as necessary.

Background:

  • the extended family member and his/her spouse inherited a fair amount of AAPL stock some years ago; they have no money of their own in AAPL;
  • they have used some of their AAPL inheritance as an ATM to remodel their home;
  • one of the spouses wants to hold on to AAPL for sentimental reasons; the other spouse is more pragmatic and much more concerned
  • they invest through a Schwab financial advisor
  • for several years now, the Schwab advisor has recommended "better" diversification which this couple has not done with AAPL; they have not sold any AAPL except for cash for home renovation (which was an incredible use of that money)
  • earlier this year, they were again advised to diversify their AAPL holdings (into what, I do not know):
  • they did not diversify and with the lawsuit announced yesterday and the loss of $7+ / share, the couple was once again concerned and asked for my advice

My comment (but not advice) yesterday: I bought more shares of AAPL.

My response to them:

  • none of us should be doing our own investing; we need to leave it up to professionals:
    • I don't service my own car; professionals maintain the car; the same should hold true for investing

Having said that, some folks just can't resist, including me.

Three questions:

  • investment horizon (how many years do you plan to hold the stock)? A trading portfolio? An investment portfolio?
  • do you want "tech" in your portfolio?
  • how risk averse are you? On a scale of 1 to 10, would a 20% drop in your portfolio push you to suicide or would you look at it as a buying opportunity?

Initial comments:

  • I can't advise regarding a trading portfolio;
  • my comments are relevant only for a several-year investment that will be held in the estate of one's heirs (in other words, you don't plan ever seeing the money)

With regard to AAPL for the extended family member who asked:

  • short term, less than two years, AAPL is "dead money." As an investment, expect it to go nowhere;
  • at five years, it might look better;
  • at thirty years, your heirs will be thrilled that AAPL is in their portfolio (comments on this later)
  • Apple will be greatly distracted by the DOJ lawsuit for the next several years which will have an unknown effect on its financial returns and on the sentiment of AAPL investors, current and potential investors;
    • it's unlikely that AAPL will benefit from this suit;
    • "everyone" loves to hate AAPL; "everyone."
    • AAPL will not benefit from:
      • YOLO: you only live one
      • MOJO: momentum 
      • FOMO: fear of missing out
      • any short squeeze
  • all-in-all, I don't see AAPL as a great investment stock for the next few years; one might be better off to simply exchange all of one's AAPL for BRK -- 
    • BRK has a lot of AAPL; 
    • one won't be giving up much dividend divesting of AAPL and switching to BRK, but you will get better peace of mind and better sleep
  • if you decide to go that route, follow AAPL very closely and try to sell as AAPL trends toward $180

With regard to AAPL for me:

  • I have a rolling 30-year horizon
  • I want a fair amount of tech in that part of the portfolio I personally manage
  • as well as NVDA, AMD, and so many others are performing, I still prefer AAPL
  • AAPL for me is unique for many reasons

I have to pick up Sophia. I will come back to this later. 

Reminder: I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market, I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple.

See disclaimer. This is not an investment site.

Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, job, career, travel, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or think you may have read here. 

All my posts are done quickly: there will be content and typographical errors. If anything on any of my posts is important to you, go to the source. If/when I find typographical / content errors, I will correct them. 

Again, all my posts are done quickly. There will be typographical and content errors in all my posts. If any of my posts are important to you, go to the source.

Reminder: I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market, I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple

With regard to this comment, at thirty years, your heirs will be thrilled that AAPL is in their portfolio (comments on this later)

  • at least once every year, evaluate your entire portfolio and how AAPL fits into that portfolio

****************************
More

Up until now, AAPL was considered by this extended family member and spouse to be a long term holding. Over five years, regardless of the loss yesterday, a paper loss:

  • in 2019: it was a $50-stock
  • today, a $180-stock
  • people talk about doubling one's money in seven to eight years
    • these investors more than doubled their money in less than five years
    • even though they did not sell earlier, they really haven't lost anything in the last couple of years; if nothing else, they broke even and whether they sold in 2022 or today, the results would not have been much different in the big scheme of things (unless they would have sold AAPL and bought NVDA, but that would have been very unlikely)
  • so, they should look at AAPL as a clean slate
  • this is the question:
    • looking out five years from now, if they hold their AAPL now and re-evaluate every six months, is that an awful choice, or a reasonable choice? It's probably not a great choice.
  • one option: on a monthly basis, make a decision to sell no AAPL or sell 10% of their AAPL; if they choose the latter:
    • 10% of their AAPL position into one of two sectors:
    • a nice-dividend paying stock with some potential to appreciate in share price; or,
  • give up the dividend and start building a position in BRK
  • every month, during the monthly evaluation, three choices
    • hold, sell no AAPL that month
    • sell 10% as planned
    • accelerate divestment

So, bottom, line, my advice:

  • sell 10% of their existing AAPL position each month
  • re-evaluate each month: hold, sell 10%, accelerate divestment of their AAPL position
  • with AAPL cash after the sale, put 50% into BRK and 50% into a high-dividend energy stock (like ENB) if they have "no" energy in their portfolio

How To Read A Production Statement -- March 22, 2024

Locator: 46828B.

Wow, wow, wow -- a reader whom we will call Tucker just noted a new well on his / her monthly production statement. Tucker has never paid much attention with his / her production statements but with a brand new well, Tucker thought it was a great time to see if I could help him / her with reading / making out the production statement. So, this weekend, I will post some YouTube videos explaining oil production statements. 

This should be fun.

Okay, I've started taping the videos. 

These videos are very amateurish.

I may have a lot of this wrong, and all of this information can be found on the web posted by much more knowledgeable folks and much more professionally. I often use terms incorrectly, and I often round numbers, so take all of this with a grain of salt. I'm simply trying to explain to a reader how to read his/her production statement. 

I'm hoping to provide enough information -- right, wrong, whatever -- to get the reader started. 

Feel free to fact-check and re-run the numbers. 

Again, this is for one reader; it is not for the general audience. If in any way you think this might affect your own minerals, go to other sources for better and more accurate information. 

I think Clip 1 is the worse; I may re-do it.

Clip 2 is of the well itself -- where it's located, etc.

Clip 3 is probably the one the reader is most interested in -- how to calculate the decimal unit and how the decimal unit is useful.

So, here goes.

Clip 1:

Clip 2: There is an error in the spreadsheet that I produced for this video but that error has been corrected in the post and in clip 3 below. It does not matter with regard to what I was posting in Clip 2.


Clip 3: Note only major error in this clip. I stated that the 2560 acre drilling unit was two sections, one mile by two miles. In fact, a 2560-acre drilling unit is four sections, two miles by two miles or one mile by four miles -- both methods giving one four square miles of surface area and four square miles in the drilling unit.

Wow! Gasoline Demand Is Surging Despite Price Increase -- Leading Indicator For US Economy -- March 22, 2024

Locator: 46827B.

RBN Energy: excellent, excellent article today. Cheniere, et al, were frantically building LNG export terminals based on future expectations of $10-LNG. Looks like they're going to be facing $2-LNG for many years. Perhaps "the Biden pause" was exactly what Cheniere, et al, needed, to save themselves from ... themselves.

WTI: $81.00. One step forward; two steps back. Never quits. Speaking of which, what was gasoline demand last week? Wow!

Sunday, March 24, 2024: 127 for the month; 186 for the quarter, 186 for the year

  • 40171, conf, Morgan E&P, Obrigewitch 1-33H,
  • 40110, conf, CLR, Lundberg Federal 4-8H,
  • 39644, conf, Oasis, Maridoe 5502 11-17 2B, Squires, nice-looking well for the Squires oil field:
DateOil RunsMCF Sold
1-20242397918458
12-20232942520296
11-20232258814704
10-20233054519907
9-202340682863


Saturday, March 23, 2024: 124 for the month; 183 for the quarter, 183 for the year

  • 40109, conf, CLR, Lundberg Federal 3-8H1, Rattlesnake Point,
Friday, March 22, 2024: 123 for the month; 182 for the quarter, 182 for the year
  • 39645, conf, Oasis, Maridoe 5502 11-17 3B, Squires, no data yet;

RBN Energy: is the global LNG market headed for oversupply and lower prices? Archived.

Listen to Paul Simon’s “The Sound of Silence” and you hear the words of a teenager coming to terms with the disconnect between the world his parents promised and the real world yet to come. In the LNG market, there’s a similar generational divide. A business built on long-term contracts, rigid trade patterns, and the promise of substantial growth potential is being met with a more skeptical outlook, one in which a large amount of incremental LNG supply has been locked up but serious questions remain about LNG demand. As we discuss in today’s RBN blog, an entire generation of LNG supply is being built on the presumption of selling it for $10/MMBtu or more, but a shortfall in demand growth could leave it selling for considerably less. And if that happens … sunk-cost economics, here we come.  

Can You Imagine What The Market Will Do Next Year! March 22, 2024

Locator: 46826ECON.

Can you imagine what the market will do when the Fed starts cutting rates? Wow.

I don't know if folks caught it but the "talking heads" are finally starting to talk about "the supply chain" as the main reason for inflation.

  • as the supply chain improves, inflation will drop
    • supply chain probably accounted for 80% of that peak inflation at 9%
    • in fact, inflation has now dropped from the 9-handle to the 2-handle
    • the supply chain portion of inflation was transitory
    • the underlying inflation rate (excluding supply chain issues) is said to be "sticky." In fact, it's normal. A 2-handle inflation rate is exactly what we want
  • bigger (biggest?) concern is deflation (Zeihan spoke to that today)
  • folks now realize -- and JPow practically said it -- a high Fed rate exacerbates supply chain issues
    • hopefully that doesn't need to be explained
  • this year's Fed rate cuts will have psychological effect on Wall Street; little to no effect on Main Street
    • if Fed stays on course, Main Street might start to see gains in 2025, certainly by 2026
    • housing will remain most stubborn issue
    • auto sector is about to surge (2024 - 2026)
      • biggest catalyst: Biden delaying emissions rules
      • suggests auto makers can do just fine with fake EVs (hybrid EVs)

****************************
US Economy

Link here.

5% returns: I just mentioned this yesterday -- the paltry 5% returns. Link here.

Housing: doesn't look like these folks are expecting a recession any time soon. Link here. Contracts would have been signed a month or two earlier.


All indicators: a robust economy. Link here.

 

One Word: Massive -- March 22, 2024

Locator: 46825ECON.

Ben Carson: this is pretty funny. I called it the "Goldilocks" economy well before "talking heads" called it a "Goldilocks" economy. Then later, I suggested the "Gilded Age," and here we go with Ben Carlson calling it the "Gilded Age." Whoo-hoo.

Liz Sonders:

Link here.