Updates
January 12, 2014: the numbers are low, but what is worse is the fact that the demographics are wrong -- too many old, high risk folks signing up for ObamaCare; not enough young folks enrolling. Predictable.
Reuters is reporting:
Now that more than 2 million people have signed up for private
insurance plans created by President Barack Obama's healthcare law, a
crucial next check-up for the new marketplace will be to see how old
customers are.
Early data from a handful of state exchanges shows the
administration needs more young adults to sign up in the next three
months to help offset costs from older enrollees and prevent insurers
from raising their rates.
Critics of Obama's Affordable Care Act say the market won't attract
enough young people to keep it financially viable, putting more pressure
on government funds to compensate for any insurer losses.
Data from seven states and the District of Columbia, which are
running their own marketplaces, show that of more than 200,000
enrollees, nearly 22 percent are 18 to 34 years old, according to a
Reuters analysis.
The administration had hoped that over 38 percent, or 2.7 million,
of all enrollees in 2014 would be 18 to 35 years old, based on a
Congressional Budget Office estimate that 7 million people would sign up
by the end of March.
Again, this is not a problem. The insurers are protected by the law: a bailout is guaranteed. The insurers will simply become "pass-through" entities for ObamaCare. The folks who crafted this bill were no dummies, and with a president who was given a free pass on every executive decision modifying the law, things are working out just fine for ObamaCare.
Original Post
The Dickinson Press is reporting: yup,
insurers are baffled about the low number of enrollees. Let's count the ways:
- the websites didn't work
- the federal website was taken off-line for the first three weeks
- the ObamaCare website has more security risks than the Target breach
- original website required private data submission before viewing plans
- majority of folks who thought they would qualify, do not qualify (income is required)
- the most affordable plans had a $12,000 annual deductible
But the big reason North Dakota folks did not enroll: with the Bakken boom, everyone in North Dakota is a millionaire (some billionaires) and do not qualify for subsidies, so why sign up?
Just joking. The big reason folks did not enroll: sticker shock.
The insurers are not concerned: the law provides for a bailout if the insurers lose money on this scheme.
In the end, the insurers will simply be "pass-through" entities for national health care.
In case the above link is broken:
The Sanford Health Plan enrolled 92 in North Dakota through the new marketplace exchange.
By the way,
Sanford Health has the monopoly in North Dakota for Medicaid; Blue Cross Blue Shield pulled out of Medicaid coverage in North Dakota.
***************************
Mainstream media seems to be reporting that the flu season might be earlier and worst than previous seasons. See for yourself at
Google flu trends, probably a better source than the government's own statistics. Right now, the flu season this year is much, much less severe than what it was this time last year.
************************
One would think that with
the highest corporate tax rate in the world, the US would have no trouble paying universal health care, or at least subsidizing it.
The U.S. has the highest
corporate tax rate in the developed world. After Japan lowered its tax
rate last year, the combined federal and average state tax rate of 39.2%
in the U.S. was the highest of any nation in the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development.
Some
mega-corporations pay billions of dollars every year in federal and
state taxes. In its most recent fiscal year, Exxon Mobil reported $31
billion in corporate income tax expenses.
Some large corporations, on
the other hand, paid no taxes at all and even received tax benefits.
General Motors, which had annual revenue of more than $150 billion,
received a tax benefit of $28.6 billion. 24/7 Wall St. examined the 10
U.S.-based, publicly traded companies with tax expenses of more than $5
billion in their most recently reported fiscal year, and the 10
companies that received a benefit of at least $5 million.
The ten (10) companies paying the most income tax, from least to most: Microsoft, IBM, Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan,
ConocoPhillips, Wal-Mart, Wells Fargo, Apple,
Chevron,
Exxon Mobil. I doubt we will ever see a wind energy or solar energy corporation make the top 10 list.
**********************
Speaking of corporate taxes, these corporations are also well known for philanthropy. As just one minor example,
The Bismarck Tribune is reporting:
State leaders recognized an energy company Wednesday for its $1
million contribution to the Housing Incentive Fund which fills out the
portion of the fund to be capitalized through tax credits.
Members of the North Dakota Industrial Commission recognized Denver-based QEP Resources for its contribution.
Earlier
this week it was announced that the $20 million in state tax credits
authorized by the Legislature through taxpayer contributions had been
reached. These HIF dollars are in addition to a $15.4 million direct
appropriation made to the fund for this biennium.
Gov. Jack Dalrympe said the $1 million from QEP Resources put the fund over the threshold.
I've been remiss in not reporting corporate philanthropy since the boom began -- mostly because it was hardly news -- there were so many companies donating at so many levels. But a reader pointed out that we haven't seen any donations from renewable energy companies in North Dakota. I'll watch for them. North Dakota is one of the leading wind energy states in the US.