Friday, August 2, 2013

Canadian Investigators Look At Bakken Oil As Cause of Destroying Canadian Town

A reader sent me this link. The Globe and Mail is reporting:
The train, operated by the small regional carrier Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, was carrying light oil from the Bakken oil fields of North Dakota where crude is drilled up from rock through a process known as fracking. Environmental groups and Canadian pipeline operator Enbridge Inc. have complained to U.S. federal regulators about the volatile and potentially unsafe chemical makeup of Bakken crude.
“We are aware of those experiences and have sent investigators to North Dakota, we are following the oil from the wellhead to here,” said Donald Ross, the safety board’s head investigator in Lac-Mégantic. Oil has been taken from each of the oil cars for analysis at an Ottawa-based labratory, and it could be months before the results of these tests are publicized.
Bakken oil is typically lighter than Alberta crude, rendering it more flammable when exposed to heat. This potential volatility is raising questions about whether railways and regulators are taking sufficient precautions when transporting the oil. Shortly after the derailment, Ottawa unveiled a series of tighter safety rules that call for more rail staff, supervision and safety precautions for trains carrying hazardous material.
There are many, many story lines in this article.

Something tells me the story won't get much attention. There are a lot more hazardous chemicals shipped by rail than crude oil. I imagine adding a flame retardant would increase slightly the cost of the price of oil which will be passed on to the consumer, anyway.

No comments:

Post a Comment